{"id":106323,"date":"2017-05-03T20:13:53","date_gmt":"2017-05-04T00:13:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/breaking911.com\/?p=106323"},"modified":"2017-05-03T20:14:54","modified_gmt":"2017-05-04T00:14:54","slug":"man-sentenced-attempting-defraud-dreamworks-falsely-claiming-created-kung-fu-panda","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/breaking911.com\/man-sentenced-attempting-defraud-dreamworks-falsely-claiming-created-kung-fu-panda\/","title":{"rendered":"Man Sentenced for Attempting to Defraud Dreamworks by Falsely Claiming He Created Kung Fu Panda"},"content":{"rendered":"
BOSTON \u2013 A Randolph man was sentenced today in federal court in Boston for wire fraud and perjury in connection with a scheme to defraud DreamWorks Animation SKG Inc. by falsely claiming that the company stole from him the characters and story for its animated movie Kung Fu Panda.<\/p>\n
Jayme Gordon, 51, was sentenced by U.S. District Court Chief Judge Patti B. Saris to two years in prison, three years of supervised release and ordered to pay more than $3 million in restitution. On Nov. 18, 2016, a federal jury found Gordon guilty on four counts of wire fraud and three counts of perjury.<\/p>\n
In early 2008, several months before the movie\u2019s June 2008 release, Gordon saw a trailer for Kung Fu Panda. Gordon had previously created some drawings and a story about Pandas, which he called \u201cPanda Power,\u201d that bore little resemblance to the characters in the movie. But after seeing that trailer, Gordon revised his \u201cPanda Power\u201d drawings and story and renamed it \u201cKung Fu Panda Power.\u201d<\/p>\n
He made these revisions as part of his scheme so that his work would appear to be more similar to the DreamWorks pandas he had seen in the movie trailer. In February 2011, Gordon filed a copyright infringement suit against DreamWorks in U.S. District Court in Massachusetts, and later that year, he proposed that DreamWorks agree to settle the suit by paying him $12 million. DreamWorks rejected that proposal, and the litigation continued for another two years.<\/p>\n