After Orlando, Senate bill seeks to allow FBI web searches without court order

0
416

WASHINGTON – The Senate is set to vote Wednesday on a measure to let the FBI access a person’s Internet browsing history, email account data and other electronic communications without a warrant in terrorism and spy cases.

It would also permanently extend the government’s right to conduct surveillance over potential “lone wolf” attackers.

The measure from Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John McCain, R-Ariz., and Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Richard Burr, R-N.C, has inspired a fierce backlash from privacy advocates, and could face resistance in the House, where lawmakers passed a bill earlier this year to limit the government’s authority to access email.

But McCain and Burr believe that the legislative changes are necessary in the wake of recent terror attacks such as Orlando, where a gunman claiming inspiration and loyalty to the Islamic State killed 49 people at a gay nightclub. And McCain and Burr believe they have the 60 votes necessary to get the measure through the Senate.

Earlier this year, FBI Director James Comey said that giving the government the ability to collect information about electronic communications – such as a person’s email account, how much time a person spends on various websites, and their Internet protocol address – without obtaining a court order was the bureau’s top priority.

Limits on their ability to collect such information without a court order “affects our work in a very, very big and practical way,” Comey told Burr’s committee earlier this year.

Many senators cited Comey this week while making the case for why giving the FBI the authority to access electronic data without a court order is essential in the wake of the Orlando attack.

“I have great sympathy for [privacy advocates], but I respect more the view of director Comey who has said it’s his number one priority,” McCain told reporters Tuesday. “It’s his job to protect the country.”

“Our failure to act to grant this authority, particularly in the wake of this terrible tragedy in Orlando, would be inexcusable,” Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn, R-Texas, said on the Senate floor Tuesday. “This is something the FBI director appointed by President Obama had said he needs. He said this is their number one legislative priority . . . we owe it to those on the front lines of our counterterrorism efforts to get them what they need.”

McCain and Burr’s measure, which they are presenting as an amendment to a spending bill to fund certain government agencies including the Justice Department, would let the FBI collect information on electronic communications using an administrative subpoena known as a national security letter. But their measure stops short of letting the FBI access the content of emails.

It is similar to a provision that was included in the Senate Intelligence Committee’s authorization bill, which passed that committee last month, and a Cornyn-drafted amendment to a bill making changes to Electronic Communications Privacy Act, or ECPA, that has stalled before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

The House unanimously passed its own ECPA update bill this spring, which limited government officials from reading the content emails without a warrant. It did not include a provision similar to the one the Senate will vote on Wednesday, giving the FBI expanded surveillance authority to access other electronic communications data.

Privacy advocates decried McCain and Burr’s efforts to accommodate the FBI’s demands in advance of Wednesday’s vote.

“This isn’t about giving law enforcement new tools, it’s about the FBI not wanting to do paperwork,” said Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., one of the Senate’s most vocal privacy advocates, arguing that the FBI “already has the power to demand these electronic records with a court order” and can even circumvent that in emergencies.

In a letter sent to senators Tuesday urging them to vote against the amendment, the American Civil Liberties Union stressed that the measure would “erode many of the reforms” to the Patriot Act that Congress enacted last year in the USA Freedom bill, which ended the government’s practice of bulk collecting telephone records and Internet metadata. Tech companies including Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft also oppose the amendment, ACLU officials wrote.

McCain and Burr’s amendment would also permanently extend the government’s ability to conduct surveillance on suspected “lone wolf” terrorists, even if they don’t have an established connection to a terror group. Under the USA Freedom act, that authority was supposed to expire in 2019.

The ACLU wrote in their letter to lawmakers that the extension of “lone wolf” surveillance “is unnecessary to provide the government the tools necessary to prevent terrorism.”

(c) 2016, The Washington Post ยท Karoun Demirjian

Facebook Comments